Summary:
Frank Seddio, former Brooklyn Democratic Party boss, appointed as NYC Board of Elections commissioner.
Appointment followed a contentious internal vote, with initial opposition from some Brooklyn council members.
Good-government groups criticized the lack of transparency and public input in the selection process.
The NYC Board of Elections has a history of scandals, including voter-roll purges and nepotism allegations.
Seddio, despite past criticism of progressives, pledged to improve transparency and access for voters.
Brooklyn Party Boss Lands NYC Elections Post Amidst Backlash
Former Brooklyn Democratic Party boss Frank Seddio has been unanimously approved as a New York City Board of Elections commissioner. This followed a contentious internal vote among Brooklyn City Council Democrats, with a split of 8 to 5 against his appointment before a final unanimous approval.
The Controversy:
Seddio's appointment sparked opposition from good-government groups like Citizens Union, who argued the process lacked transparency and prioritized party loyalty over qualifications. They criticized the lack of a public hearing or comment period, despite past precedents for such practices. The groups emphasized the importance of public input in selecting officials responsible for administering city elections.
Seddio's Response:
Seddio defended his appointment, highlighting his extensive experience working with the Board of Elections for over four decades. He expressed confidence in the board’s decision-making process and his own ability to improve transparency and efficiency, including a desire to better communicate the Board's activities to the public.
Background of the Board of Elections:
The NYC Board of Elections has faced numerous scandals over the years, involving issues such as illegal voter-roll purges and allegations of nepotism. Recently, an investigation revealed that the executive director, Mike Ryan, made inappropriate racial and sexual remarks to female colleagues. Rather than being fired, Ryan faced a 15-day pay cut.
Seddio's Promises:
While previously critical of “progressives,” Seddio has also pledged to push for improved access for voters, such as providing translators in additional languages at polling sites.
A Step Backwards?
Critics argue that Seddio's appointment represents a setback for reform efforts within the Board of Elections, which has historically been plagued by party patronage. They maintain that appointing a former party boss undermines the push for a more professional and transparent election administration process. The ongoing concern focuses on maintaining the integrity and public trust in the city's electoral system.
Comments
Join Our Community
Create an account to share your thoughts, engage with others, and be part of our growing community.