Staten Island judge strikes down city's Victory Boulevard bus lanes, calling them too narrow to be safe
A state Supreme Court justice annulled the DOT's approval of new curbside bus lanes in Grymes Hill and by Clove Lakes Park, finding 10.5-foot lanes fell short of the agency's own design guidance.

Photo: Jim.henderson / Wikimedia Commons · CC0
- Richmond County Supreme Court Justice Orlando Marrazzo Jr. ruled Tuesday that the DOT's Victory Boulevard bus-lane plan was "arbitrary and capricious," the Staten Island Advance reported.
- The ruling bars the DOT from continuing, implementing or enforcing the lanes on that stretch and annuls the agency's decision approving them, according to the Advance.
- The judge focused on width: the lanes were designed at 10.5 feet, while the DOT's Street Design Manual recommends at least 11 feet for curbside bus lanes.
- The contested lanes run from Forest Avenue to Eddy Street in Grymes Hill and from Seneca Avenue to Little Clove Road by Clove Lakes Park, with peak-hour parking bans.
- DOT has said the corridor carries 25,000+ daily riders on 16 bus routes and saw 619 injuries in five years.
A Staten Island judge has thrown out the city's plan for new curbside bus lanes on Victory Boulevard, ruling Tuesday that the Department of Transportation squeezed the lanes onto a road too narrow to hold them safely, the Staten Island Advance/SILive.com reported.
Richmond County Supreme Court Justice Orlando Marrazzo Jr. found the DOT's decision "arbitrary and capricious" and an abuse of discretion, according to the Advance. The order immediately bars the agency from continuing, implementing or enforcing the bus-lane plan on that part of Victory Boulevard and annuls the decision that authorized it. In his decision, the judge wrote that the agency had "shoehorned" a bus lane onto the roadway and called it "counterproductively dangerous," the Advance reported.
Why the judge ruled against the lanes
The ruling turned on width. The DOT's Street Design Manual recommends curbside bus lanes at least 11 feet wide and says buses and trucks need lanes 11 to 12 feet wide, but the Victory Boulevard lanes were designed at 10.5 feet, the Advance reported. At an August hearing, the DOT's director of bus priority, Nolan Levenson, acknowledged the lanes fell short of the guideline while calling it guidance rather than a rule, and said contractors had at first painted some sections about 9.5 feet wide before crews repainted them, the Advance reported then.
The case was brought by Victory Boulevard resident Kevin Squires, who argued the plan would eliminate nearly 200 parking spaces. Borough President Vito Fossella, who opposed the project, testified, as did representatives of Notre Dame Academy and Wagner College and the borough's emergency management director.
What the plan was
The DOT and the MTA pitched the project as a way to speed up buses heading to and from the St. George ferry terminal. In a 2025 presentation to Community Board 1, the DOT said Victory Boulevard carries more than 25,000 daily riders on 16 bus routes and saw 619 injuries in five years, including 60 people severely injured, and that bus riders make up 48% of road users north of Jersey Street. The plan called for:
- painting the existing bus lanes between Bay Street and Forest Avenue red and extending their hours to 6 to 9 a.m. toward the ferry and 3 to 7 p.m. away from it;
- new curbside bus lanes, with parking banned during those hours, from Forest Avenue to near Eddy Street in Grymes Hill, alongside Silver Lake Park, and from Seneca Avenue to Little Clove Road by Clove Lakes Park;
- rubber speed bumps at some turns. The DOT's own presentation flagged the stretch between Notre Dame and Eddy Street as too narrow for a bus lane.
The two new curbside segments are the part that drew opposition. The broader corridor project, listed on the city's bus projects page, runs from Bay Street to Wild Avenue in Travis.
A long fight in court
Marrazzo first paused the project in early July. About two weeks later, an appellate court in Brooklyn lifted that order at the city's request, allowing work to start, and the lanes were painted over the summer. Unlike that temporary order, Tuesday's decision annuls the DOT's approval itself. The city can still appeal, as it did successfully in July.
- Staten Island Advance/SILive.comStaten Island judge strikes down city's controversial Victory Blvd. bus-lane plan
- NYC Department of TransportationVictory Boulevard, Bay Street to Little Clove Road - Community Board 1 presentation (May 2025)
- NYC Department of TransportationFast Buses: Bus projects
- Staten Island Advance/SILive.comControversial Victory Boulevard bus lane width takes center stage in court proceedings
- Staten Island Advance/SILive.comStaten Island bus lane battle takes dramatic turn as appellate court lifts block
Every story links to the reporting and records it’s based on. Our editors write each piece from public reporting and official data, and check it against those sources before it’s published.
Comments
0NSynced with CommunityIn CommunityYour comment is also posted to Community with this story attached, so neighbors can find it and reply there too.
No comments yet
Start the conversation — your comment shows up here and in Community for neighbors nearby.